In this argument that the author reaches the conclusion that
Several reasons are offered in support of this argument.
First of all, the author cites the fact that
What's more, the author points that
This argument sounds plausible initially,
but further reflection reveals that the conclusion is based on
some dubious assumptions and the reasoning is biased because
the inadequacy and partiality in the nature of evidence provided to justify the conclusion.
A careful examination would review how groundless this conclusion is.
Based on the reasons I list above, the argument is not completely sound.
The evidences in support of the conclusion does little to prove it since
it does not address the assumptions I have raised.