Some people hold that college students are supposed to study imperative courses
assigned by the government while others argue that they should be endowed with the right
to select whatever subjects appealing to their own interest. As far as I'm concerned, I
side with the latter viewpoint and will demonstrate it in the following aspects.
First and foremost, it is the basic human right to make personal choices, including what to
study on campus, as schools are mere places for receiving education rather than military camps
forcing people to accept everything imposed on them. Student, despite the fact that they just
step into adulthood and my thus be inexperienced, actually don't need the government to confine
them to a tiny little framework of knowledge. As an independent university student, one is both
supposed to and to apply for any subject he's keen on and shoulder all responsibilities for the
decision.
In the second place, each individual is distinctive, meaning that one doubtlessly has his own
aptitude as well as weakness. As is known to all, one man's meat could be another's poison.
Therefore, the government should be sensible entitle every single student to design on his own
curriculum according to his specific learning style and preferences. It would have catastrophe to
have forced Beethoven to major in math and Einstein to work on opera.
Every coin has two sides. Admittedly, there are still few merits for students to take subjects
determined by the government. For instance, students can better comprehend and pursue the latest
trend of the country's cultural orientation, if they want to. What's more, they can lead a
relatively easier academic life simply by following what is already prepare for them by the
government. However, we can notify that these incentives are just for the sake of convenience.
To sum up, to select subject at one's own will contributes more to students' all-round development
and it conforms more closely to human nature as well.